Talk:Philhipé
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages. Imported revision history was preserved on the source pages; this page contains a new combined discussion copy for easier reading and use with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
Source for Ret-Con
Rob ret-conned Philhipé's death, but for the life of me I cannot find where he did it. If memory serves it's somewhere inside the behind the scenes video, but I cannot find a timestamp in there for the life of me! If anyone finds it, please insert it into the article. Chronohawk (talk) 18:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Finding it now, IIRC its just after he crosses the bridge in the behind the scenes. Plornt (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Class
In some articles he is referenced as a Paladin yet the article states Kobold classes haven't been yet implemented, but I doubt there will be Kobold specific classes. His abilities are mentioned as Paladin magic though. Either he should be a paladin or he should not. Skydivizer (talk) 20:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Rob said, while in character, that "[He] was just a Kobold Paladin..." so lets just say that any race can be any class so long as they show evidence of their capabilities. Like the Gemlings would not have a class, btu Kobolds and Elves certainly would. --IronClark (talk) 20:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't remember that. Anyways I agree. I have changed his Race and Class description appropriately. Skydivizer (talk) 20:21, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
NPC
Should we classify Philhipé as an NPC? For all intensive purposes he is( or at least was) one, but by the end of the campaign was technically played by Deadbones. I'm not sure what to classify him as. --Petertwnsnd (talk) 15:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- He started as an NPC and remained so for most of the Campaign, I think classifying him as an NPC would be fine. --Razorhead (talk) 17:20, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
