Talk:Cards
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages. Imported revision history was preserved on the source pages; this page contains a new combined discussion copy for easier reading and use with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
Archived discussion from Archive 1
Please feel free to add cards in the same format as below--Red Rath (talk) 22:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hmm trying to figure out how to place the default Gnome card in the table format in addition to the sub-species Pillowkeeper (talk) 06:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Having it go "Main Card - Subspecies - Subspecies" seems like a good idea. And maybe desaturate the colors a bit? I dunno, I never been a big fan of Green, so I am probably NOT the best help on that xD --IronClark (talk) 06:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with the desaturation or changing color of the green i am not a fan of it (i did it at 6:30 in the morning)--Red Rath (talk) 08:45, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am also going to add a race section for the Sub-race cards so that you are able to differentiate who the class is applicable to, this is very clear for the dwarfs however is not clear for the gnomes --Red Rath (talk) 08:48, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Should we add all the cards here, or should we create separate pages for Races, Classes, Items and Treasures? Because now, Races, Items and Treasure are here, but Classes each have their own different page.--Razorhead (talk) This thing didn't show up, so I did it manually.
- It's a good question... honestly I believe we should split the page up and only talk about the categories of cards here. Because at some point the number of cards here may be completely overwhelming and unapproachable. By splitting them up we may be able to cut down on that. On the other hand there are benefits to keeping them all in one place where they're easily accessible. Chronohawk (talk) 22:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Perhaps we could provide a list of all the cards, split up by category, but no image or description. Then we create the subpages Races, Treasures and Items and copy the content we have now over there. I don't think we should split up the Races page into different pages for now, since we don't really have all that much races anyway and we can easily create different headers such as 'Header Elf' with the main card and a list of the subrace cards. --Razorhead (talk) 07:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Yeah the table format was just temporary, it would work much better if we had a list of cards without images or description but just links for individual pages. If we wanted I could set up a sortable table for a list of cards to put on the main page so people can find stuff easier. Pillowkeeper (talk) 16:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'll start work on creating an 'Items' page much like the 'Treasures' one. Once all cards are on their respective pages, we can start to just have a table with the card name which links to the other pages.--Razorhead (talk) 21:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- When I first made this page it was my intention for it to be temporary and to get the ball rolling as when i made this there was very little content on the website--Red Rath (talk) 22:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- All Items and Treasures are documented, up-to-date, on the respective pages. These categories can now be put into a general table.--Razorhead (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Now that all Items, Treasure, Races, Subraces and Class Abilities cards currectly in use or confirmed have been added to their own pages, the current content of this page has become deprecated. I propose we create a list for each category with links to the card descriptions on their pages eg.
| Item Cards |
|---|
| Oaken Staff |
| Shortbow |
--Razorhead (talk) 14:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Loops
It seems like we hit the maximum number of loops for the treasure template table, any way to fix that? Pillowkeeper (talk) 17:56, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Treasure template table? Got a link? The filter one isn't bound by those limits as its a widget, if its not that one then link me so I can edit the max loops for that page. (Its not an actual software limitation its so people dont make an infinite loop and crash the wiki) Plornt (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Edit dont worry haha, just saw its the one on this page hence why you posted it here. Give me a sec to increase the limit. Plornt (talk) 18:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed. If it happens again can you put it in the admin todo so I dont end up missing it as I am the only one able to fix it Plornt (talk) 18:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
