Template talk:Dwarf: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Plornt in topic General discussion
Normalize legacy talk signatures for DiscussionTools |
Clean legacy archive discussion formatting |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Consolidated discussion notice | {{Consolidated discussion notice | ||
|sources= | |sources= | ||
* [ | * [{{fullurl:Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1|redirect=no}} Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1] | ||
}} | }} | ||
<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | <!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | ||
<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1 --> | <!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1 --> | ||
== General discussion == | |||
Hey nice work on this, perhaps though it'd make more sense to make a template of this box that we can edit on the pages themselves? That way we have separation of concerns regarding markup and actual information. Templates usually dont contain the text you want, just the general layout. [[User:Plornt|Plornt]] ([[User talk:Plornt|talk]]) 09:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | Hey nice work on this, perhaps though it'd make more sense to make a template of this box that we can edit on the pages themselves? That way we have separation of concerns regarding markup and actual information. Templates usually dont contain the text you want, just the general layout. [[User:Plornt|Plornt]] ([[User talk:Plornt|talk]]) 09:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
::I think it's fine. Wikipedia.org does it like this[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Carl_Nielsen_works], only they add an extra step of having a generic navbox template. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 10:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | ::I think it's fine. Wikipedia.org does it like this[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Carl_Nielsen_works], only they add an extra step of having a generic navbox template. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 10:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:53, 28 April 2026
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages for compatability with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
General discussion
Hey nice work on this, perhaps though it'd make more sense to make a template of this box that we can edit on the pages themselves? That way we have separation of concerns regarding markup and actual information. Templates usually dont contain the text you want, just the general layout. Plornt (talk) 09:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's fine. Wikipedia.org does it like this[1], only they add an extra step of having a generic navbox template. Skydivizer (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ah fair enough then! All is good! Plornt (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's fine. Wikipedia.org does it like this[1], only they add an extra step of having a generic navbox template. Skydivizer (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
