Talk:Players: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Rob in topic Archived discussion from Archive 1
Recover restored legacy discussion archive content from XML history |
Normalize legacy talk signatures for DiscussionTools |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=Talk:Players|date=2015-06-25}} | {{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=Talk:Players|date=2015-06-25}} | ||
* I was thinking that the list of guests should be in a table format, stating what campaigns they appeared in and in that campaign what characters they played as --[[User:Red Rath|Red Rath]] ([[User talk:Red Rath|talk]]) | * I was thinking that the list of guests should be in a table format, stating what campaigns they appeared in and in that campaign what characters they played as --[[User:Red Rath|Red Rath]] ([[User talk:Red Rath|talk]]) 09:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
* I don't think you need to separate guests based on if they are in or not in the Buffalo Wizards. [[User:Rob|Rob]] ([[User talk:Rob|talk]]) | * I don't think you need to separate guests based on if they are in or not in the Buffalo Wizards. [[User:Rob|Rob]] ([[User talk:Rob|talk]]) 08:30, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Players/Archive 1 --> | <!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Players/Archive 1 --> | ||
Revision as of 03:41, 28 April 2026
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages for compatability with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
Archived discussion from Archive 1
- I was thinking that the list of guests should be in a table format, stating what campaigns they appeared in and in that campaign what characters they played as --Red Rath (talk) 09:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think you need to separate guests based on if they are in or not in the Buffalo Wizards. Rob (talk) 08:30, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
