User talk:IronClark: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>IronClark No edit summary |
imported>CoconutM1lk No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:IMO the Races article should not list indepth information about an individual race. Just a general explanation of what races mean in the concept of the game, plus a list of the races with a descriptive line or two. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 04:36, 3 June 2015 (EDT) | :IMO the Races article should not list indepth information about an individual race. Just a general explanation of what races mean in the concept of the game, plus a list of the races with a descriptive line or two. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 04:36, 3 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
::I agree, we should keep both, but have the Races article more light in information, but have the individual race pages be much more informative. --[[User:IronClark|IronClark]] ([[User talk:IronClark|talk]]) 13:22, 3 June 2015 (EDT) | ::I agree, we should keep both, but have the Races article more light in information, but have the individual race pages be much more informative. --[[User:IronClark|IronClark]] ([[User talk:IronClark|talk]]) 13:22, 3 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::Okay, we can do that :) [[User:CoconutM1lk|CoconutM1lk]] ([[User talk:CoconutM1lk|talk]]) 13:27, 3 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:27, 3 June 2015
I see that you worked on the Dwarf page but I worked on the page Races and they have pretty much the same info so which one should we use? CoconutM1lk (talk) 04:06, 3 June 2015 (EDT)
- IMO the Races article should not list indepth information about an individual race. Just a general explanation of what races mean in the concept of the game, plus a list of the races with a descriptive line or two. Skydivizer (talk) 04:36, 3 June 2015 (EDT)
- I agree, we should keep both, but have the Races article more light in information, but have the individual race pages be much more informative. --IronClark (talk) 13:22, 3 June 2015 (EDT)
- Okay, we can do that :) CoconutM1lk (talk) 13:27, 3 June 2015 (EDT)
- I agree, we should keep both, but have the Races article more light in information, but have the individual race pages be much more informative. --IronClark (talk) 13:22, 3 June 2015 (EDT)
