Talk:Treasures: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Plornt No edit summary |
imported>Razorhead Response to Plornt |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:Really? I think it provides a nice and clear overview of all the Treasure cards. We can also link to each element in the list, since it has an id eg. [[Treasures#Amulet of Bones]]. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 04:21, 6 June 2015 (EDT) | :Really? I think it provides a nice and clear overview of all the Treasure cards. We can also link to each element in the list, since it has an id eg. [[Treasures#Amulet of Bones]]. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 04:21, 6 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
::It was more the fact it doesnt scale well for smaller screens, it literally was going off screen and the description box was only about 50pixels wide, plus you couldnt see what row coresponded to what when you scrolled down, so you'd have a random "Yes" in a column and not immediately know what it was talking about. I mean if others think the table works/looks better then by all means revert back. Just my 2 cents. Not to offend anyone that worked on the design/table, I mean it wasnt bad or anything like that, I just didnt think it fit that style of content [[User:Plornt|Plornt]] ([[User talk:Plornt|talk]]) 13:01, 6 June 2015 (EDT) | ::It was more the fact it doesnt scale well for smaller screens, it literally was going off screen and the description box was only about 50pixels wide, plus you couldnt see what row coresponded to what when you scrolled down, so you'd have a random "Yes" in a column and not immediately know what it was talking about. I mean if others think the table works/looks better then by all means revert back. Just my 2 cents. Not to offend anyone that worked on the design/table, I mean it wasnt bad or anything like that, I just didnt think it fit that style of content [[User:Plornt|Plornt]] ([[User talk:Plornt|talk]]) 13:01, 6 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::That looks way better than I imagined! I'm impressed. I've only found 1 issue, but I've placed this on the Talk page for the widget. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 13:32, 6 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:33, 6 June 2015
Sorting
How should we sort Treasure cards, since they vary wildly? Tdis8629 (talk) 21:22, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
Do we really need to sort it, we have sortable tables right now? Pillowkeeper (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
Can we get a template for these treasures as well? When I made the table I never set up a template. Pillowkeeper (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
Is it just my screen or does the template for this page go outside of the wiki bounds? Plornt (talk) 20:21, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
Dont edit this page for the moment, going to create a custom widget with filtering as I dont think this style of content fits a table Plornt (talk) 20:21, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
- Just to clarify, you can edit the page contents, just dont edit the template just yet!
- Really? I think it provides a nice and clear overview of all the Treasure cards. We can also link to each element in the list, since it has an id eg. Treasures#Amulet of Bones. --Razorhead (talk) 04:21, 6 June 2015 (EDT)
- It was more the fact it doesnt scale well for smaller screens, it literally was going off screen and the description box was only about 50pixels wide, plus you couldnt see what row coresponded to what when you scrolled down, so you'd have a random "Yes" in a column and not immediately know what it was talking about. I mean if others think the table works/looks better then by all means revert back. Just my 2 cents. Not to offend anyone that worked on the design/table, I mean it wasnt bad or anything like that, I just didnt think it fit that style of content Plornt (talk) 13:01, 6 June 2015 (EDT)


