Talk:Timeline: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Dishcat3 No edit summary |
imported>IronClark |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::::Mods can delete pages yeah, uh I mean though, if we're going to use this in the future doesnt it make sense to keep it but just not link to it as a useful page yet? I mean it was established that they definitely are going to go back to the same places as different characters/different times? | ::::::Mods can delete pages yeah, uh I mean though, if we're going to use this in the future doesnt it make sense to keep it but just not link to it as a useful page yet? I mean it was established that they definitely are going to go back to the same places as different characters/different times? | ||
:::::::Where does Unforgotten Realms (Show) take place on the timeline? [[User:Dishcat3|Dishcat3]] ([[User talk:Dishcat3|talk]]) 15:46, 13 June 2015 (EDT) | :::::::Where does Unforgotten Realms (Show) take place on the timeline? [[User:Dishcat3|Dishcat3]] ([[User talk:Dishcat3|talk]]) 15:46, 13 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
::::::::It doesn't. Rob has said it is noncanon. --''[[User:IronClark|Clark]] ([[User talk:IronClark|Chitter Chat]])'' 15:51, 13 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:51, 13 June 2015
What is the point?
What is the point of keeping track of the "timeline"? We have yet to had any story take place prior to a past campaign. Every week's campign takes place after the previous week's campaign so what's the point of this "timeline"? --Petertwnsnd (talk) 13:43, 12 June 2015 (EDT)
- To be honest, right now I think it's pretty useless. But perhaps when backstories get more fleshed out this page will become more useful? --Razorhead (talk) 14:19, 12 June 2015 (EDT)
- I agree. If we ever get a campaign that is clearly established to take place prior to a previous campaign then a page like this will come in handy and we can bring it back/make a new page then, however at the present it doesn't useful or helpful and should just be deleted. --Petertwnsnd (talk) 14:26, 12 June 2015 (EDT)
- I second that Peter. The page, at this time, is rather useless since the campaigns have been straight forward. But in later months, campaigns and Coe's Quest will require a timeline eventually--Clark (Chitter Chat) 14:29, 12 June 2015 (EDT)
- Alright, then can one of you Moderators delete it? --Petertwnsnd (talk) 15:15, 12 June 2015 (EDT)
- Can moderators delete pages or do I need to ask Plornt? --Petertwnsnd (talk) 12:25, 13 June 2015 (EDT)
- Mods can delete pages yeah, uh I mean though, if we're going to use this in the future doesnt it make sense to keep it but just not link to it as a useful page yet? I mean it was established that they definitely are going to go back to the same places as different characters/different times?
- Where does Unforgotten Realms (Show) take place on the timeline? Dishcat3 (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2015 (EDT)
- It doesn't. Rob has said it is noncanon. --Clark (Chitter Chat) 15:51, 13 June 2015 (EDT)
- Where does Unforgotten Realms (Show) take place on the timeline? Dishcat3 (talk) 15:46, 13 June 2015 (EDT)
- Mods can delete pages yeah, uh I mean though, if we're going to use this in the future doesnt it make sense to keep it but just not link to it as a useful page yet? I mean it was established that they definitely are going to go back to the same places as different characters/different times?
- Can moderators delete pages or do I need to ask Plornt? --Petertwnsnd (talk) 12:25, 13 June 2015 (EDT)
- Alright, then can one of you Moderators delete it? --Petertwnsnd (talk) 15:15, 12 June 2015 (EDT)
- I second that Peter. The page, at this time, is rather useless since the campaigns have been straight forward. But in later months, campaigns and Coe's Quest will require a timeline eventually--Clark (Chitter Chat) 14:29, 12 June 2015 (EDT)
- I agree. If we ever get a campaign that is clearly established to take place prior to a previous campaign then a page like this will come in handy and we can bring it back/make a new page then, however at the present it doesn't useful or helpful and should just be deleted. --Petertwnsnd (talk) 14:26, 12 June 2015 (EDT)
