Template talk:Dwarf: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Wikitext talk to Flow conversion |
Consolidate or redirect 1 legacy discussion archive page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | |||
{{Consolidated discussion notice | |||
|sources= | |||
* [[Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1]] | |||
}} | |||
<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | |||
== Archived discussion from [[Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1|Archive 1]] == | |||
<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1 --> | |||
{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=Template talk:Dwarf|date=2015-06-27}} | {{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=Template talk:Dwarf|date=2015-06-27}} | ||
| Line 4: | Line 15: | ||
::I think it's fine. Wikipedia.org does it like this[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Carl_Nielsen_works], only they add an extra step of having a generic navbox template. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 06:45, 9 June 2015 (EDT) | ::I think it's fine. Wikipedia.org does it like this[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Carl_Nielsen_works], only they add an extra step of having a generic navbox template. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 06:45, 9 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::Ah fair enough then! All is good! [[User:Plornt|Plornt]] ([[User talk:Plornt|talk]]) 07:13, 9 June 2015 (EDT) | :::Ah fair enough then! All is good! [[User:Plornt|Plornt]] ([[User talk:Plornt|talk]]) 07:13, 9 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1 --> | |||
Revision as of 00:12, 28 April 2026
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages for compatability with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
Archived discussion from Archive 1
Hey nice work on this, perhaps though it'd make more sense to make a template of this box that we can edit on the pages themselves? That way we have separation of concerns regarding markup and actual information. Templates usually dont contain the text you want, just the general layout. Plornt (talk) 05:10, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
- I think it's fine. Wikipedia.org does it like this[1], only they add an extra step of having a generic navbox template. Skydivizer (talk) 06:45, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
