File talk:Ability gem.png: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Wikitext talk to Flow conversion |
Consolidate or redirect 1 legacy discussion archive page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | |||
{{Consolidated discussion notice | |||
|sources= | |||
* [[File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1]] | |||
}} | |||
<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | |||
== Archived discussion from [[File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1|Archive 1]] == | |||
<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1 --> | |||
{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=File talk:Ability gem.png|date=2015-06-27}} | {{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=File talk:Ability gem.png|date=2015-06-27}} | ||
| Line 4: | Line 15: | ||
:On Coe's dev talk/Art stream, the gem is listed as Ability, which matches "magical" items, such as the Cursed Book and Ring of Fire, as well as his source file being labeled as the same. I was contemplating changing over the image name to the "official," but it is still debatable. [[User:Tdis8629|Tdis8629]] ([[User talk:Tdis8629|talk]]) 22:48, 4 June 2015 (EDT) | :On Coe's dev talk/Art stream, the gem is listed as Ability, which matches "magical" items, such as the Cursed Book and Ring of Fire, as well as his source file being labeled as the same. I was contemplating changing over the image name to the "official," but it is still debatable. [[User:Tdis8629|Tdis8629]] ([[User talk:Tdis8629|talk]]) 22:48, 4 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
:Ok for now I'll go with Coe's original dev stuff. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) 22:51, 4 June 2015 (EDT) | :Ok for now I'll go with Coe's original dev stuff. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) 22:51, 4 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1 --> | |||
Revision as of 00:11, 28 April 2026
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages. Imported revision history was preserved on the source pages; this page contains a new combined discussion copy for easier reading and use with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
Archived discussion from Archive 1
Some slight confusion is this gem meant to represent reusable or ability. It is different on multiple pages. Pillowkeeper (talk) 22:20, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
- On Coe's dev talk/Art stream, the gem is listed as Ability, which matches "magical" items, such as the Cursed Book and Ring of Fire, as well as his source file being labeled as the same. I was contemplating changing over the image name to the "official," but it is still debatable. Tdis8629 (talk) 22:48, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
- Ok for now I'll go with Coe's original dev stuff. Pillowkeeper (talk) 22:51, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
