Template talk:LocationBox/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Razorhead m Razorhead moved page Category talk:Location to Template talk:LocationBox: Wrong talk page |
imported>Razorhead Answer to Skydivizer. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT) | Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
:I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
::Whoops, you are correct. I moved it to the correct page. About the race/characters, I don't really mind. I don't think we will ever revisit a location so many times that it becomes not worth it to put on the box. We only have like two or three entries per location now as it is. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 12:27, 9 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:27, 9 June 2015
Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --Razorhead (talk) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
- I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p Skydivizer (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
- Whoops, you are correct. I moved it to the correct page. About the race/characters, I don't really mind. I don't think we will ever revisit a location so many times that it becomes not worth it to put on the box. We only have like two or three entries per location now as it is. --Razorhead (talk) 12:27, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
