Moderator Talk: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Petertwnsnd No edit summary |
imported>Petertwnsnd No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="alert alert-danger">This page is purely for the Moderators and Administrator of the Buffalo Wizards Wiki to talk to each other. | <div class="alert alert-danger">This page is purely for the Moderators and Administrator of the Buffalo Wizards Wiki to talk to each other. | ||
If you are not a moderator any edits you create here will be reverted.</div> | If you are not a moderator any edits you create here will be reverted.</div> | ||
__TOC__ | |||
===List of Moderators=== | ===List of Moderators=== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
* [[User:Plornt|Plornt]], the creator of the site is also the current, and only, Administrator. | * [[User:Plornt|Plornt]], the creator of the site is also the current, and only, Administrator. | ||
==Character Page Layout== | |||
Hey guys, a few days ago Skydivizer [[Talk:Characters#Layout suggestion|made a suggestion]] to clean up the Character Pages to adhere to a unified and simpler "template"/style, because right now we've got different styles for the character pages from the Nuren campaign, RBoT, Porc Hunters and Dingo Isles. I recommend you check out his proposal, because I would like to have some more feedback about. Personally I find it better than what we've got now (because do we really need to list their race and class again when that's already in the charbox and the short description up above, and do we really need to say what Charge or Parry does on every users character page while there's a link to the ability -once again- in the charbox?). I just want to hear what you guys think about this. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|Leave me a note]]) 10:45, 15 June 2015 (EDT) | Hey guys, a few days ago Skydivizer [[Talk:Characters#Layout suggestion|made a suggestion]] to clean up the Character Pages to adhere to a unified and simpler "template"/style, because right now we've got different styles for the character pages from the Nuren campaign, RBoT, Porc Hunters and Dingo Isles. I recommend you check out his proposal, because I would like to have some more feedback about. Personally I find it better than what we've got now (because do we really need to list their race and class again when that's already in the charbox and the short description up above, and do we really need to say what Charge or Parry does on every users character page while there's a link to the ability -once again- in the charbox?). I just want to hear what you guys think about this. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|Leave me a note]]) 10:45, 15 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
: I think it's pretty good. I also think having the race and class reiterated a second/third time on the page is unnecessary especially since it's usually in the first line and the charbox. I think the reason we were putting the description of each ability on every page was because we started doing that before the anchors were in place to let us link directly to ability itself and not just the class page and we just didn't stop after we got the anchors. However, I think the belongings are good the way they are currently with a category for Items, Treasures, and RP Item since that information may need to be more detailed for characters who gain and destroy/loose a lot of treasure over the course of a campaign like [[Jo Krisstal]]. I think we should keep the final stats of the characters, like their items and how much stamina they can have in the charbox while information regarding on how those stats changed throughout the campaign should be on the page itself. --[[User:Petertwnsnd|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd|Message a Moderator]]) 11:14, 15 June 2015 (EDT) | : I think it's pretty good. I also think having the race and class reiterated a second/third time on the page is unnecessary especially since it's usually in the first line and the charbox. I think the reason we were putting the description of each ability on every page was because we started doing that before the anchors were in place to let us link directly to ability itself and not just the class page and we just didn't stop after we got the anchors. However, I think the belongings are good the way they are currently with a category for Items, Treasures, and RP Item since that information may need to be more detailed for characters who gain and destroy/loose a lot of treasure over the course of a campaign like [[Jo Krisstal]]. I think we should keep the final stats of the characters, like their items and how much stamina they can have in the charbox while information regarding on how those stats changed throughout the campaign should be on the page itself. --[[User:Petertwnsnd|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd|Message a Moderator]]) 11:14, 15 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
==Spoilers== | |||
This is pretty minor, but can we agree to only mark pages about the most recent campaign as spoilers? I don't want to over use it so people who are new to the series are afraid to read pages about previous campaigns. --[[User:Petertwnsnd|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd|Message a Moderator]]) 11:26, 15 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:26, 15 June 2015
This page is purely for the Moderators and Administrator of the Buffalo Wizards Wiki to talk to each other.
If you are not a moderator any edits you create here will be reverted.
List of Moderators
You can check the list of current moderators here
The Current List is:
- IronClark
- Petertwnsnd
- Razorhead
- Red Rath
- Skydivizer
- Tdis8629
- Plornt, the creator of the site is also the current, and only, Administrator.
Character Page Layout
Hey guys, a few days ago Skydivizer made a suggestion to clean up the Character Pages to adhere to a unified and simpler "template"/style, because right now we've got different styles for the character pages from the Nuren campaign, RBoT, Porc Hunters and Dingo Isles. I recommend you check out his proposal, because I would like to have some more feedback about. Personally I find it better than what we've got now (because do we really need to list their race and class again when that's already in the charbox and the short description up above, and do we really need to say what Charge or Parry does on every users character page while there's a link to the ability -once again- in the charbox?). I just want to hear what you guys think about this. --Razorhead (Leave me a note) 10:45, 15 June 2015 (EDT)
- I think it's pretty good. I also think having the race and class reiterated a second/third time on the page is unnecessary especially since it's usually in the first line and the charbox. I think the reason we were putting the description of each ability on every page was because we started doing that before the anchors were in place to let us link directly to ability itself and not just the class page and we just didn't stop after we got the anchors. However, I think the belongings are good the way they are currently with a category for Items, Treasures, and RP Item since that information may need to be more detailed for characters who gain and destroy/loose a lot of treasure over the course of a campaign like Jo Krisstal. I think we should keep the final stats of the characters, like their items and how much stamina they can have in the charbox while information regarding on how those stats changed throughout the campaign should be on the page itself. --Petertwnsnd (Message a Moderator) 11:14, 15 June 2015 (EDT)
Spoilers
This is pretty minor, but can we agree to only mark pages about the most recent campaign as spoilers? I don't want to over use it so people who are new to the series are afraid to read pages about previous campaigns. --Petertwnsnd (Message a Moderator) 11:26, 15 June 2015 (EDT)
