Talk:Treasures: Difference between revisions
imported>Plornt No edit summary |
imported>Razorhead Relief. |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Just so ya know, im editing this page to add new cards, please dont change as it'l conflict since I might be a while going through all the cards! [[User:Plornt|Plornt]] ([[User talk:Plornt|talk]]) 12:34, 13 June 2015 (EDT) | Just so ya know, im editing this page to add new cards, please dont change as it'l conflict since I might be a while going through all the cards! [[User:Plornt|Plornt]] ([[User talk:Plornt|talk]]) 12:34, 13 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
:Was just about to start. Thanks for taking this load off my back! --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 12:47, 13 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:47, 13 June 2015
Sorting
How should we sort Treasure cards, since they vary wildly? Tdis8629 (talk) 21:22, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
Do we really need to sort it, we have sortable tables right now? Pillowkeeper (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
Can we get a template for these treasures as well? When I made the table I never set up a template. Pillowkeeper (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
Is it just my screen or does the template for this page go outside of the wiki bounds? Plornt (talk) 20:21, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
Dont edit this page for the moment, going to create a custom widget with filtering as I dont think this style of content fits a table Plornt (talk) 20:21, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
- Just to clarify, you can edit the page contents, just dont edit the template just yet!
- Really? I think it provides a nice and clear overview of all the Treasure cards. We can also link to each element in the list, since it has an id eg. Treasures#Amulet of Bones. --Razorhead (talk) 04:21, 6 June 2015 (EDT)
- It was more the fact it doesnt scale well for smaller screens, it literally was going off screen and the description box was only about 50pixels wide, plus you couldnt see what row coresponded to what when you scrolled down, so you'd have a random "Yes" in a column and not immediately know what it was talking about. I mean if others think the table works/looks better then by all means revert back. Just my 2 cents. Not to offend anyone that worked on the design/table, I mean it wasnt bad or anything like that, I just didnt think it fit that style of content Plornt (talk) 13:01, 6 June 2015 (EDT)
Editing this page
Just so ya know, im editing this page to add new cards, please dont change as it'l conflict since I might be a while going through all the cards! Plornt (talk) 12:34, 13 June 2015 (EDT)
