Talk:Porc Hunters: Difference between revisions

From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Plornt in topic Archived discussion from Archive 1
Jump to navigationJump to search
Recover restored legacy discussion archive content from XML history
Normalize legacy talk signatures for DiscussionTools
Line 14: Line 14:
{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=Talk:Porc Hunters|date=2015-06-25}}
{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=Talk:Porc Hunters|date=2015-06-25}}


We should probably use the current tense rather than speaking in the past about something thats going to happen in the future. Its not a major deal to go through and edit them plus it makes more sense. [[User:Plornt|Plornt]] ([[User talk:Plornt|talk]]) 18:50, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
We should probably use the current tense rather than speaking in the past about something thats going to happen in the future. Its not a major deal to go through and edit them plus it makes more sense. [[User:Plornt|Plornt]] ([[User talk:Plornt|talk]]) 22:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Porc Hunters/Archive 1 -->
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Porc Hunters/Archive 1 -->

Revision as of 03:41, 28 April 2026

Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages. Imported revision history was preserved on the source pages; this page contains a new combined discussion copy for easier reading and use with DiscussionTools.

Source pages:


Archived discussion from Archive 1

We should probably use the current tense rather than speaking in the past about something thats going to happen in the future. Its not a major deal to go through and edit them plus it makes more sense. Plornt (talk) 22:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply