Talk:Players: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Consolidate or redirect 1 legacy discussion archive page |
Recover restored legacy discussion archive content from XML history |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
}} | }} | ||
<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | <!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | ||
== Archived discussion from [[Talk:Players/Archive 1|Archive 1]] == | |||
<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Players/Archive 1 --> | |||
<!-- Recovered from restored XML revision 7284 (2015-06-25T12:36:44Z). --> | |||
{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=Talk:Players|date=2015-06-25}} | |||
* I was thinking that the list of guests should be in a table format, stating what campaigns they appeared in and in that campaign what characters they played as --[[User:Red Rath|Red Rath]] ([[User talk:Red Rath|talk]]) 05:12, 3 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
* I don't think you need to separate guests based on if they are in or not in the Buffalo Wizards. [[User:Rob|Rob]] ([[User talk:Rob|talk]]) 04:30, 10 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Players/Archive 1 --> | |||
Revision as of 00:30, 28 April 2026
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages for compatability with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
Archived discussion from Archive 1
- I was thinking that the list of guests should be in a table format, stating what campaigns they appeared in and in that campaign what characters they played as --Red Rath (talk) 05:12, 3 June 2015 (EDT)
- I don't think you need to separate guests based on if they are in or not in the Buffalo Wizards. Rob (talk) 04:30, 10 June 2015 (EDT)
