Template talk:Card Sheet/Class/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Skydivizer No edit summary |
imported>Razorhead No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::I personally think it's neater to have cards with a N/A for range, than to try and force it in with the gem classification such as 'Weapon (Range = 5)' --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 07:34, 5 June 2015 (EDT) | ::I personally think it's neater to have cards with a N/A for range, than to try and force it in with the gem classification such as 'Weapon (Range = 5)' --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 07:34, 5 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::I figured it's a gem on the card so why should it be more in the table. But if you wish I can add the column now. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 07:38, 5 June 2015 (EDT) | :::I figured it's a gem on the card so why should it be more in the table. But if you wish I can add the column now. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 07:38, 5 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
::::Well, we do use a separate column for range on the [[Items#Weapons|ranged weapons]] page, so this might be more consistent. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 07:49, 5 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:49, 5 June 2015
Just wondering if we can add an ability to change the colors of the tables as well as the option to add anchors for individual rows. Not sure how the whole template thing works. This is mainly so we can standardize the card format on all pages. Pillowkeeper (talk) 00:06, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
- I added id's. They just take the name variable. Should work as the anchor. Skydivizer (talk) 07:33, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
Perhaps it would be possible to add a range column to the template. Right now we have to add the range to the gem classification, which is rather messy. --Razorhead (talk) 07:23, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
- I disliked the whole range column thing since half of the class cards don't have the range attribute. But it can be re-added if desired. Skydivizer (talk) 07:29, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
- I personally think it's neater to have cards with a N/A for range, than to try and force it in with the gem classification such as 'Weapon (Range = 5)' --Razorhead (talk) 07:34, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
- I figured it's a gem on the card so why should it be more in the table. But if you wish I can add the column now. Skydivizer (talk) 07:38, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
- Well, we do use a separate column for range on the ranged weapons page, so this might be more consistent. --Razorhead (talk) 07:49, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
- I figured it's a gem on the card so why should it be more in the table. But if you wish I can add the column now. Skydivizer (talk) 07:38, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
- I personally think it's neater to have cards with a N/A for range, than to try and force it in with the gem classification such as 'Weapon (Range = 5)' --Razorhead (talk) 07:34, 5 June 2015 (EDT)


