Talk:NPCs: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Pcplague in topic Purpose
Clean legacy archive discussion formatting |
m Add used discussion-page tracking category |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
}} | }} | ||
<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | <!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | ||
__TOC__ | |||
<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:NPCs/Archive 1 --> | <!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:NPCs/Archive 1 --> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:NPCs/Archive 1 --> | <!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:NPCs/Archive 1 --> | ||
[[Category:Discussions]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 28 April 2026
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages for compatability with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
Purpose
This page currently is not really needed it might as well just redirect to the character page. Skydivizer (talk) 10:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, the info on this page would just be repeated on the characters page. Pcplague (talk) 04:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Frogs
-TGoreMaster: Is the Frog a relevant enough mob to really make a page on it?? TGoreMaster (talk)
- I think that in the Dank Dungeons and Dragons campaign Justin got turned into a frog, but that's about it I think. It also has nothing to do with the actual mob enemy, as well as having taken place in a non-canon campaign, so I believe that this link can just go. --Razorhead (talk) 07:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- I agree. I removed it from the page totally. It seems like in URLive there will not be normal animals. Currently I don't think we need to list it here at all. Skydivizer (talk) 07:49, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
