Template talk:LocationBox: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Razorhead in topic General discussion
imported>Razorhead Question about style. |
m Add used discussion-page tracking category |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) | <!-- URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | ||
{{Consolidated discussion notice | |||
|sources= | |||
* [{{fullurl:Template talk:LocationBox/Archive 1|redirect=no}} Template talk:LocationBox/Archive 1] | |||
}} | |||
<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | |||
__TOC__ | |||
<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Template talk:LocationBox/Archive 1 --> | |||
== General discussion == | |||
Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 15:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
:I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 16:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
::Whoops, you are correct. I moved it to the correct page. About the race/characters, I don't really mind. I don't think we will ever revisit a location so many times that it becomes not worth it to put on the box. We only have like two or three entries per location now as it is. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 16:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::I didn't necessarily mean to not put it in the box. I'd just like to have a clearer layout. See the example I added here. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 17:09, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::Ah yes, that way! That might indeed be better, yes. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 17:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
<div class="pure-g content-box" style="float:right;max-width: 300px;min-width:300px;"> | |||
<div class="pure-u-24-24 content-box-heading">Location</div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-24-24"> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-12-24">(...)</div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-12-24">(...)</div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-12-24"><strong>Home To:</strong></div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-12-24">Dwarves, Gnomes</div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-12-24"><strong>Residents:</strong></div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-12-24">Thorin<br>Balin<br>Dwalin<br>Fili<br>Kili</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="pure-g content-box" style="float:right;max-width: 300px;min-width:300px;"> | |||
<div class="pure-u-24-24 content-box-heading">Location</div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-24-24"> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-12-24">(...)</div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-12-24">(...)</div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-12-24"><strong>Home To:</strong></div> | |||
<div class="pure-u-12-24">Dwarves<br>Gnomes<br>Thorin<br>Balin<br>Dwalin<br>Fili<br>Kili</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Template talk:LocationBox/Archive 1 --> | |||
[[Category:Discussions]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 28 April 2026
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages for compatability with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
General discussion
Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --Razorhead (talk) 15:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p Skydivizer (talk) 16:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Whoops, you are correct. I moved it to the correct page. About the race/characters, I don't really mind. I don't think we will ever revisit a location so many times that it becomes not worth it to put on the box. We only have like two or three entries per location now as it is. --Razorhead (talk) 16:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't necessarily mean to not put it in the box. I'd just like to have a clearer layout. See the example I added here. Skydivizer (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ah yes, that way! That might indeed be better, yes. --Razorhead (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't necessarily mean to not put it in the box. I'd just like to have a clearer layout. See the example I added here. Skydivizer (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Whoops, you are correct. I moved it to the correct page. About the race/characters, I don't really mind. I don't think we will ever revisit a location so many times that it becomes not worth it to put on the box. We only have like two or three entries per location now as it is. --Razorhead (talk) 16:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Location
(...)
(...)
Home To:
Dwarves, Gnomes
Residents:
Thorin
Balin
Dwalin
Fili
Kili
Balin
Dwalin
Fili
Kili
Location
(...)
(...)
Home To:
Dwarves
Gnomes
Thorin
Balin
Dwalin
Fili
Kili
Gnomes
Thorin
Balin
Dwalin
Fili
Kili


