Talk:Treasures

Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages for compatability with DiscussionTools.

Source pages:

* Talk:Treasures/Archive 1

Sorting

How should we sort Treasure cards, since they vary wildly? Tdis8629 (talk) 01:22, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Do we really need to sort it, we have sortable tables right now? Pillowkeeper (talk) 01:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Can we get a template for these treasures as well? When I made the table I never set up a template. Pillowkeeper (talk) 17:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Done --Razorhead (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Is it just my screen or does the template for this page go outside of the wiki bounds? Plornt (talk) 00:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Dont edit this page for the moment, going to create a custom widget with filtering as I dont think this style of content fits a table Plornt (talk) 00:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Just to clarify, you can edit the page contents, just dont edit the template just yet!

Really? I think it provides a nice and clear overview of all the Treasure cards. We can also link to each element in the list, since it has an id eg. Treasures#Amulet of Bones. --Razorhead (talk) 08:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

It was more the fact it doesnt scale well for smaller screens, it literally was going off screen and the description box was only about 50pixels wide, plus you couldnt see what row coresponded to what when you scrolled down, so you'd have a random "Yes" in a column and not immediately know what it was talking about. I mean if others think the table works/looks better then by all means revert back. Just my 2 cents. Not to offend anyone that worked on the design/table, I mean it wasnt bad or anything like that, I just didnt think it fit that style of content Plornt (talk) 17:01, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

That looks way better than I imagined! I'm impressed. I've only found 1 issue, but I've placed this on the Talk page for the widget. --Razorhead (talk) 17:32, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Extra Gems

This widget needs the Interrupt gem, the Limited gem and the new Radius gem, which we don't have yet. Also, should the type for melee be boolean instead of number? --Razorhead (Leave me a note) 14:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Melee gem should be a number due to there being cards with melee amounts now (from week 3). Once we have the new gems we can put it in, for now what we can do is put the numbers in so like cards.name.limited/radius and then when we get the gem info it'l be easy to just put in the new gems. ~~ Plornt (Ask an Administrator) 08:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Ah, so I can already put those variables in there? Ok! --Razorhead (Leave me a note) 09:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Editing this page

Just so ya know, im editing this page to add new cards, please dont change as it'l conflict since I might be a while going through all the cards! Plornt (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Was just about to start. Thanks for taking this load off my back! --Razorhead (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Lmao, done now damnit, I should have waited a while longer! Plornt (talk) 17:48, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Looks like I didnt save you much time afterall missing those treasures >.> To be fair I probably didnt miss them but accidentally overwrote them as I was copying and pasting ~~ Plornt (Ask an Administrator) 18:54, 13 June 2015 (UTC)