Talk:Players: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Rob in topic General discussion
Wikitext talk to Flow conversion |
m Add used discussion-page tracking category |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | <!-- URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | ||
{{Consolidated discussion notice | |||
|sources= | |||
* [{{fullurl:Talk:Players/Archive 1|redirect=no}} Talk:Players/Archive 1] | |||
}} | |||
<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | |||
__TOC__ | |||
* I don't think you need to separate guests based on if they are in or not in the Buffalo Wizards. [[User:Rob|Rob]] ([[User talk:Rob|talk]]) | <!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Players/Archive 1 --> | ||
<!-- Recovered from restored XML revision 7284 (2015-06-25T12:36:44Z). --> | |||
== General discussion == | |||
* I was thinking that the list of guests should be in a table format, stating what campaigns they appeared in and in that campaign what characters they played as --[[User:Red Rath|Red Rath]] ([[User talk:Red Rath|talk]]) 09:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
* I don't think you need to separate guests based on if they are in or not in the Buffalo Wizards. [[User:Rob|Rob]] ([[User talk:Rob|talk]]) 08:30, 10 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Players/Archive 1 --> | |||
[[Category:Discussions]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 28 April 2026
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages for compatability with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
General discussion
- I was thinking that the list of guests should be in a table format, stating what campaigns they appeared in and in that campaign what characters they played as --Red Rath (talk) 09:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think you need to separate guests based on if they are in or not in the Buffalo Wizards. Rob (talk) 08:30, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
