File talk:Ability gem.png: Difference between revisions

From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Pillowkeeper in topic General discussion
Jump to navigationJump to search
← Older edit
Spooky (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators
3,787 edits
VisualWikitext
Wikitext talk to Flow conversion
m Add used discussion-page tracking category
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=File talk:Ability gem.png|date=2015-06-27}}
<!-- URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE -->
{{Consolidated discussion notice
|sources=
* [{{fullurl:File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1|redirect=no}} File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1]
}}
<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE -->


Some slight confusion is this gem meant to represent reusable or ability. It is different on multiple pages. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) 22:20, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
__TOC__
:On Coe's dev talk/Art stream, the gem is listed as Ability, which matches "magical" items, such as the Cursed Book and Ring of Fire, as well as his source file being labeled as the same. I was contemplating changing over the image name to the "official," but it is still debatable. [[User:Tdis8629|Tdis8629]] ([[User talk:Tdis8629|talk]]) 22:48, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
 
:Ok for now I'll go with Coe's original dev stuff. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) 22:51, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1 -->
 
== General discussion ==
Some slight confusion is this gem meant to represent reusable or ability. It is different on multiple pages. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) 02:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
:On Coe's dev talk/Art stream, the gem is listed as Ability, which matches "magical" items, such as the Cursed Book and Ring of Fire, as well as his source file being labeled as the same. I was contemplating changing over the image name to the "official," but it is still debatable. [[User:Tdis8629|Tdis8629]] ([[User talk:Tdis8629|talk]]) 02:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
:Ok for now I'll go with Coe's original dev stuff. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) 02:51, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1 -->
[[Category:Discussions]]

Latest revision as of 16:01, 28 April 2026

Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages. Imported revision history was preserved on the source pages; this page contains a new combined discussion copy for easier reading and use with DiscussionTools.



General discussion

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Some slight confusion is this gem meant to represent reusable or ability. It is different on multiple pages. Pillowkeeper (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

On Coe's dev talk/Art stream, the gem is listed as Ability, which matches "magical" items, such as the Cursed Book and Ring of Fire, as well as his source file being labeled as the same. I was contemplating changing over the image name to the "official," but it is still debatable. Tdis8629 (talk) 02:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
Ok for now I'll go with Coe's original dev stuff. Pillowkeeper (talk) 02:51, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
Retrieved from "https://URwiki.phijkchu.com/index.php?title=File_talk:Ability_gem.png&oldid=54289"