File talk:Ability gem.png: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Pillowkeeper in topic General discussion
Consolidate or redirect 1 legacy discussion archive page |
Add table of contents to discussion pages |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Consolidated discussion notice | {{Consolidated discussion notice | ||
|sources= | |sources= | ||
* [ | * [{{fullurl:File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1|redirect=no}} File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1] | ||
}} | }} | ||
<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | <!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | ||
__TOC__ | |||
<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1 --> | <!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1 --> | ||
== General discussion == | |||
Some slight confusion is this gem meant to represent reusable or ability. It is different on multiple pages. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) 02:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
Some slight confusion is this gem meant to represent reusable or ability. It is different on multiple pages. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) | :On Coe's dev talk/Art stream, the gem is listed as Ability, which matches "magical" items, such as the Cursed Book and Ring of Fire, as well as his source file being labeled as the same. I was contemplating changing over the image name to the "official," but it is still debatable. [[User:Tdis8629|Tdis8629]] ([[User talk:Tdis8629|talk]]) 02:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
:On Coe's dev talk/Art stream, the gem is listed as Ability, which matches "magical" items, such as the Cursed Book and Ring of Fire, as well as his source file being labeled as the same. I was contemplating changing over the image name to the "official," but it is still debatable. [[User:Tdis8629|Tdis8629]] ([[User talk:Tdis8629|talk]]) | :Ok for now I'll go with Coe's original dev stuff. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) 02:51, 5 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
:Ok for now I'll go with Coe's original dev stuff. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) | |||
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1 --> | <!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: File talk:Ability gem.png/Archive 1 --> | ||
Latest revision as of 05:55, 28 April 2026
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages. Imported revision history was preserved on the source pages; this page contains a new combined discussion copy for easier reading and use with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
General discussion
Some slight confusion is this gem meant to represent reusable or ability. It is different on multiple pages. Pillowkeeper (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- On Coe's dev talk/Art stream, the gem is listed as Ability, which matches "magical" items, such as the Cursed Book and Ring of Fire, as well as his source file being labeled as the same. I was contemplating changing over the image name to the "official," but it is still debatable. Tdis8629 (talk) 02:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ok for now I'll go with Coe's original dev stuff. Pillowkeeper (talk) 02:51, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
