Template talk:Dwarf: Difference between revisions
From Unforgotten Realms Wiki
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Plornt in topic General discussion
Clean legacy archive discussion formatting |
m Add used discussion-page tracking category |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
}} | }} | ||
<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | <!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE --> | ||
__TOC__ | |||
<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1 --> | <!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1 --> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1 --> | <!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Template talk:Dwarf/Archive 1 --> | ||
[[Category:Discussions]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 28 April 2026
Legacy discussion notice: This talk page was consolidated from restored legacy discussion pages for compatability with DiscussionTools.
Source pages:
General discussion
Hey nice work on this, perhaps though it'd make more sense to make a template of this box that we can edit on the pages themselves? That way we have separation of concerns regarding markup and actual information. Templates usually dont contain the text you want, just the general layout. Plornt (talk) 09:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's fine. Wikipedia.org does it like this[1], only they add an extra step of having a generic navbox template. Skydivizer (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ah fair enough then! All is good! Plornt (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think it's fine. Wikipedia.org does it like this[1], only they add an extra step of having a generic navbox template. Skydivizer (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
