|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=Template talk:Card Sheet/Class|date=2015-06-27}}
| | #REDIRECT [[Template talk:Card Sheet/Class]] |
|
| |
|
| Just wondering if we can add an ability to change the colors of the tables as well as the option to add anchors for individual rows. Not sure how the whole template thing works. This is mainly so we can standardize the card format on all pages. [[User:Pillowkeeper|Pillowkeeper]] ([[User talk:Pillowkeeper|talk]]) 00:06, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| | <!-- Legacy discussion archive consolidated into [[Template talk:Card Sheet/Class]] on 2026-04-27. Imported revision history remains available in this page's history. --> |
| :I added id's. They just take the name variable. Should work as the anchor. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 07:33, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| Perhaps it would be possible to add a range column to the template. Right now we have to add the range to the gem classification, which is rather messy. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 07:23, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| :I disliked the whole range column thing since half of the class cards don't have the range attribute. But it can be re-added if desired. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 07:29, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| ::I personally think it's neater to have cards with a N/A for range, than to try and force it in with the gem classification such as 'Weapon (Range = 5)' --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 07:34, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| :::I figured it's a gem on the card so why should it be more in the table. But if you wish I can add the column now. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 07:38, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| ::::Well, we do use a separate column for range on the [[Items#Weapons|ranged weapons]] page, so this might be more consistent. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 07:49, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| :::::Yeah because they all have the same gems. I mean like the crystal catalyst card has a NPC with value 10. Whirlwind has a melee with 5. Should I add a melee column? Although that melee one might be a typo. I just find it clunky. I mean maybe we could make the table so it has (small) columns for each possible gem where you can either put in a value or just a cross if it is a gem without a value or something. Something like this, but with better markup off course.[[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 08:05, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| <table border="0" cellspacing="0" class="card-table ewikitable sortable mw-collapsible">
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <th>Ability</th>
| |
| <th>Description</th>
| |
| <th style="width:5%">[[File:Melee_gem.png|50px]]</th>
| |
| <th style="width:5%">[[File:Range_gem.png|50px]]</th>
| |
| <th style="width:5%">[[File:Spell_gem.png|50px]]</th>
| |
| <th style="width:5%">[[File:Interrupt_gem.png|50px]]</th>
| |
| <th style="width:5%">[[File:Buff_gem.png|50px]]</th>
| |
| <th style="width:5%">[[File:Pet_gem.png|50px]]</th>
| |
| <th style="width:5%">[[File:Limited_gem.png|50px]]</th>
| |
| <th style="width:5%">Stamina cost</th>
| |
| <th>Image</th>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| | |
| <tr id ="{{{name1}}}">
| |
| <td>Charm</td>
| |
| <td>The role-player must take a selfie and post it to the social media platform of their choice. Once this has been done you may attempt to charm a target. If successful the Bard may control the targets actions on their turn until the target breaks free.</td>
| |
| <td></td>
| |
| <td>5</td>
| |
| <td></td>
| |
| <td></td>
| |
| <td></td>
| |
| <td>Yes</td>
| |
| <td>Yes</td>
| |
| <td>3</td>
| |
| <td>[[File:Bard_Charm.png|325x325px]]</td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| | |
| ::::::That looks pretty good. I think you've got it. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 08:43, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| Could we perhaps move this to Card Sheet/Class ? Just for consistency? --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 09:52, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| :Yeah. Good plan. [[User:Skydivizer|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer|talk]]) 09:53, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| ==Radius==
| |
| Abilities can have the radius gem now. Since no clean image has been uploaded yet, I just used text for right now. This needs to be adapted. --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|Leave me a note]]) 08:55, 17 June 2015 (EDT)
| |
