Template talk:LocationBox/Archive 1 - Revision history

imported>Mayonnaisinator at 20:36, 6 January 2017

2017-01-06T20:36:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 6 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page\|from=Template talk:LocationBox\|date=2015-06-27}}~~

	Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT)		Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT)

Flow talk page manager: Wikitext talk to Flow conversion

2015-06-27T15:05:08Z

Wikitext talk to Flow conversion

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:05, 27 June 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page\|from=Template talk:LocationBox\|date=2015-06-27}}

	Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT)		Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
	:I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p [[User:Skydivizer\|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer\|talk]]) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (EDT)		:I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p [[User:Skydivizer\|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer\|talk]]) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (EDT)

Flow talk page manager: Flow talk page manager moved page Template talk:LocationBox to Template talk:LocationBox/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect: Conversion of wikitext talk to Flow from Template talk:LocationBox

2015-06-27T15:05:08Z

Flow talk page manager moved page Template talk:LocationBox to Template talk:LocationBox/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect: Conversion of wikitext talk to Flow from Template talk:LocationBox

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:05, 27 June 2015
(No difference)

imported>Razorhead: Response to Skydivizer

2015-06-09T17:14:22Z

Response to Skydivizer

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 9 June 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Whoops, you are correct. I moved it to the correct page. About the race/characters, I don't really mind. I don't think we will ever revisit a location so many times that it becomes not worth it to put on the box. We only have like two or three entries per location now as it is. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 12:27, 9 June 2015 (EDT)		::Whoops, you are correct. I moved it to the correct page. About the race/characters, I don't really mind. I don't think we will ever revisit a location so many times that it becomes not worth it to put on the box. We only have like two or three entries per location now as it is. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 12:27, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
	:::I didn't necessarily mean to not put it in the box. I'd just like to have a clearer layout. See the example I added here. [[User:Skydivizer\|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer\|talk]]) 13:09, 9 June 2015 (EDT)		:::I didn't necessarily mean to not put it in the box. I'd just like to have a clearer layout. See the example I added here. [[User:Skydivizer\|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer\|talk]]) 13:09, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
			::::Ah yes, that way! That might indeed be better, yes. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 13:14, 9 June 2015 (EDT)

	<div class="pure-g content-box" style="float:right;max-width: 300px;min-width:300px;">		<div class="pure-g content-box" style="float:right;max-width: 300px;min-width:300px;">

imported>Skydivizer: response to Razorhead

2015-06-09T17:11:35Z

response to Razorhead

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 9 June 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p [[User:Skydivizer\|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer\|talk]]) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (EDT)		:I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p [[User:Skydivizer\|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer\|talk]]) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
	::Whoops, you are correct. I moved it to the correct page. About the race/characters, I don't really mind. I don't think we will ever revisit a location so many times that it becomes not worth it to put on the box. We only have like two or three entries per location now as it is. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 12:27, 9 June 2015 (EDT)		::Whoops, you are correct. I moved it to the correct page. About the race/characters, I don't really mind. I don't think we will ever revisit a location so many times that it becomes not worth it to put on the box. We only have like two or three entries per location now as it is. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 12:27, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
			:::I didn't necessarily mean to not put it in the box. I'd just like to have a clearer layout. See the example I added here. [[User:Skydivizer\|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer\|talk]]) 13:09, 9 June 2015 (EDT)


			<div class="pure-g content-box" style="float:right;max-width: 300px;min-width:300px;">
			<div class="pure-u-24-24 content-box-heading">Location</div>
			<div class="pure-u-24-24">
			</div>
			<div class="pure-u-12-24">(...)</div>
			<div class="pure-u-12-24">(...)</div>
			<div class="pure-u-12-24"><strong>Home To:</strong></div>
			<div class="pure-u-12-24">Dwarves, Gnomes</div>

			<div class="pure-u-12-24"><strong>Residents:</strong></div>
			<div class="pure-u-12-24">Thorin<br>Balin<br>Dwalin<br>Fili<br>Kili</div>
			</div>

			<div class="pure-g content-box" style="float:right;max-width: 300px;min-width:300px;">
			<div class="pure-u-24-24 content-box-heading">Location</div>
			<div class="pure-u-24-24">
			</div>
			<div class="pure-u-12-24">(...)</div>
			<div class="pure-u-12-24">(...)</div>
			<div class="pure-u-12-24"><strong>Home To:</strong></div>
			<div class="pure-u-12-24">Dwarves<br>Gnomes<br>Thorin<br>Balin<br>Dwalin<br>Fili<br>Kili</div>
			</div>

imported>Razorhead: Answer to Skydivizer.

2015-06-09T16:27:33Z

Answer to Skydivizer.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 9 June 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT)		Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
	::I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p [[User:Skydivizer\|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer\|talk]]) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (EDT)		:I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p [[User:Skydivizer\|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer\|talk]]) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
			::Whoops, you are correct. I moved it to the correct page. About the race/characters, I don't really mind. I don't think we will ever revisit a location so many times that it becomes not worth it to put on the box. We only have like two or three entries per location now as it is. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 12:27, 9 June 2015 (EDT)

imported>Razorhead: Razorhead moved page Category talk:Location to Template talk:LocationBox: Wrong talk page

2015-06-09T16:25:20Z

Razorhead moved page Category talk:Location to Template talk:LocationBox: Wrong talk page

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 9 June 2015
(No difference)

imported>Skydivizer: template talk

2015-06-09T16:10:50Z

template talk

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 9 June 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT)		Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT)
			::I don't really care. I like the list more for characters. What I don't like is that we now mix races, creatures and characters into that category. I think it would be better to just list the race & creatures that live there and mention notable inhabitants somewhere in the article or add a new section to the template. Also minor thing: this is the talk for the category not the template :p [[User:Skydivizer\|Skydivizer]] ([[User talk:Skydivizer\|talk]]) 12:10, 9 June 2015 (EDT)

imported>Razorhead: Question about style.

2015-06-09T15:32:12Z

Question about style.

New page

Right now on the pages featuring this template, for the 'Home to' category there are two styles: just listing all inhabitants with a comma, or using a HTML list. Could we decide on a style to use here? --[[User:Razorhead|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead|talk]]) 11:32, 9 June 2015 (EDT)