Talk:Character Page Sample - Revision history

Spooky: Add used discussion-page tracking category

2026-04-28T16:01:28Z

Add used discussion-page tracking category

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:01, 28 April 2026
Line 21:		Line 21:

	<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->		<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->
			[[Category:Discussions]]

Spooky: Add table of contents to discussion pages

2026-04-28T05:55:49Z

Add table of contents to discussion pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:55, 28 April 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	}}		}}
	<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE -->		<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE -->

			__TOC__

	<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->		<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->

Spooky: Clean legacy archive discussion formatting

2026-04-28T04:52:46Z

Clean legacy archive discussion formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 28 April 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{Consolidated discussion notice		{{Consolidated discussion notice
	\|sources=		\|sources=
	* [[Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1]]		* [{{fullurl:Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1\|redirect=no}} Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1]
	}}		}}
	<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE -->		<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE -->

	~~== Archived discussion from [[Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1\|Archive 1]] ==~~

	<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->		<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->
Line 12:		Line 10:
	<!-- Recovered from restored XML revision 7413 (2015-06-25T12:37:01Z). -->		<!-- Recovered from restored XML revision 7413 (2015-06-25T12:37:01Z). -->

	~~{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page\|from=Talk:Character Page Sample\|date=2015-06-25}}~~		== Template ==

	=== Template ===
	This page could probably be made a template for more people to be able to see and use it. [[User:Pcplague\|Pcplague]] ([[User talk:Pcplague\|talk]]) 05:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)		This page could probably be made a template for more people to be able to see and use it. [[User:Pcplague\|Pcplague]] ([[User talk:Pcplague\|talk]]) 05:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
	: At this point it's not finalized. The mods were talking about making an update unified style for all the Character pages since some are disjointed and most have useless sections. Theoretically we could make it a template, however it'd tka e along time and have to be pretty intricate. Because we didn't have a campaign this week we have more time to re-do and fine tune a lot of the pages since we don't have to moderate the new ones so we'll probably work on it soon. --[[User:Petertwnsnd\|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd\|Message a Mod]]) 05:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)		: At this point it's not finalized. The mods were talking about making an update unified style for all the Character pages since some are disjointed and most have useless sections. Theoretically we could make it a template, however it'd tka e along time and have to be pretty intricate. Because we didn't have a campaign this week we have more time to re-do and fine tune a lot of the pages since we don't have to moderate the new ones so we'll probably work on it soon. --[[User:Petertwnsnd\|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd\|Message a Mod]]) 05:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
	::I don't like the idea of making an entire page a template. Templates are for little sections that we often reuse, but an entire page should never be a template. What if we want to add some new sections to some character pages? What if we need different CSS? Template fields also really limit the options you have for both content and mark-up. Not to mention that it would be very confusing for new editors to edit, since it doesn't work the way normal MediaWiki mark-up does. I think we should style both the old and new character pages to this sample, sure, I'm all for consistency, I think it's a very good idea. But not making it a template. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 11:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)		::I don't like the idea of making an entire page a template. Templates are for little sections that we often reuse, but an entire page should never be a template. What if we want to add some new sections to some character pages? What if we need different CSS? Template fields also really limit the options you have for both content and mark-up. Not to mention that it would be very confusing for new editors to edit, since it doesn't work the way normal MediaWiki mark-up does. I think we should style both the old and new character pages to this sample, sure, I'm all for consistency, I think it's a very good idea. But not making it a template. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 11:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

	=== Order ===		== Order ==
	Personally I think History should be between Relationships and Notable Attributes. I think it fits more up top. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 11:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)		Personally I think History should be between Relationships and Notable Attributes. I think it fits more up top. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 11:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

	<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->		<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->

Spooky: Normalize legacy talk signatures for DiscussionTools

2026-04-28T03:40:45Z

Normalize legacy talk signatures for DiscussionTools

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:40, 28 April 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:

	=== Template ===		=== Template ===
	This page could probably be made a template for more people to be able to see and use it. [[User:Pcplague\|Pcplague]] ([[User talk:Pcplague\|talk]]) 01:02, 21 June 2015 (~~EDT~~)		This page could probably be made a template for more people to be able to see and use it. [[User:Pcplague\|Pcplague]] ([[User talk:Pcplague\|talk]]) 05:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
	: At this point it's not finalized. The mods were talking about making an update unified style for all the Character pages since some are disjointed and most have useless sections. Theoretically we could make it a template, however it'd tka e along time and have to be pretty intricate. Because we didn't have a campaign this week we have more time to re-do and fine tune a lot of the pages since we don't have to moderate the new ones so we'll probably work on it soon. --[[User:Petertwnsnd\|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd\|Message a Mod]]) 01:11, 21 June 2015 (~~EDT~~)		: At this point it's not finalized. The mods were talking about making an update unified style for all the Character pages since some are disjointed and most have useless sections. Theoretically we could make it a template, however it'd tka e along time and have to be pretty intricate. Because we didn't have a campaign this week we have more time to re-do and fine tune a lot of the pages since we don't have to moderate the new ones so we'll probably work on it soon. --[[User:Petertwnsnd\|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd\|Message a Mod]]) 05:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
	::I don't like the idea of making an entire page a template. Templates are for little sections that we often reuse, but an entire page should never be a template. What if we want to add some new sections to some character pages? What if we need different CSS? Template fields also really limit the options you have for both content and mark-up. Not to mention that it would be very confusing for new editors to edit, since it doesn't work the way normal MediaWiki mark-up does. I think we should style both the old and new character pages to this sample, sure, I'm all for consistency, I think it's a very good idea. But not making it a template. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:45, 21 June 2015 (~~EDT~~)		::I don't like the idea of making an entire page a template. Templates are for little sections that we often reuse, but an entire page should never be a template. What if we want to add some new sections to some character pages? What if we need different CSS? Template fields also really limit the options you have for both content and mark-up. Not to mention that it would be very confusing for new editors to edit, since it doesn't work the way normal MediaWiki mark-up does. I think we should style both the old and new character pages to this sample, sure, I'm all for consistency, I think it's a very good idea. But not making it a template. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 11:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

	=== Order ===		=== Order ===
	Personally I think History should be between Relationships and Notable Attributes. I think it fits more up top. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:46, 21 June 2015 (~~EDT~~)		Personally I think History should be between Relationships and Notable Attributes. I think it fits more up top. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 11:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

	<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->		<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->

Spooky: Recover restored legacy discussion archive content from XML history

2026-04-28T00:30:25Z

Recover restored legacy discussion archive content from XML history

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, 28 April 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	}}		}}
	<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE -->		<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE -->

			== Archived discussion from [[Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1\|Archive 1]] ==

			<!-- URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->

			<!-- Recovered from restored XML revision 7413 (2015-06-25T12:37:01Z). -->

			{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page\|from=Talk:Character Page Sample\|date=2015-06-25}}

			=== Template ===
			This page could probably be made a template for more people to be able to see and use it. [[User:Pcplague\|Pcplague]] ([[User talk:Pcplague\|talk]]) 01:02, 21 June 2015 (EDT)
			: At this point it's not finalized. The mods were talking about making an update unified style for all the Character pages since some are disjointed and most have useless sections. Theoretically we could make it a template, however it'd tka e along time and have to be pretty intricate. Because we didn't have a campaign this week we have more time to re-do and fine tune a lot of the pages since we don't have to moderate the new ones so we'll probably work on it soon. --[[User:Petertwnsnd\|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd\|Message a Mod]]) 01:11, 21 June 2015 (EDT)
			::I don't like the idea of making an entire page a template. Templates are for little sections that we often reuse, but an entire page should never be a template. What if we want to add some new sections to some character pages? What if we need different CSS? Template fields also really limit the options you have for both content and mark-up. Not to mention that it would be very confusing for new editors to edit, since it doesn't work the way normal MediaWiki mark-up does. I think we should style both the old and new character pages to this sample, sure, I'm all for consistency, I think it's a very good idea. But not making it a template. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:45, 21 June 2015 (EDT)

			=== Order ===
			Personally I think History should be between Relationships and Notable Attributes. I think it fits more up top. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:46, 21 June 2015 (EDT)

			<!-- /URWIKI_CONSOLIDATED_SOURCE: Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 -->

Spooky: Consolidate or redirect 1 legacy discussion archive page

2026-04-28T00:12:06Z

Consolidate or redirect 1 legacy discussion archive page

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 28 April 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~Archive for converted wikitext talk page~~\|~~from~~=Talk:Character Page Sample~~\|date=2015-06-25}}~~		<!-- URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE -->
			{{Consolidated discussion notice
	~~== Template ==~~		\|sources=
			* [[Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1]]
	~~This page could probably be made a template for more people to be able to see and use it. [[User:Pcplague\|Pcplague]] ([[User talk:Pcplague\|talk~~]]~~) 01:02, 21 June 2015 (EDT)~~		}}
	: At this point it's not finalized. The mods were talking about making an update unified style for all the Character pages since some are disjointed and most have useless sections. Theoretically we could make it a template, however it'd tka e along time and have to be pretty intricate. Because we didn't have a campaign this week we have more time to re-do and fine tune a lot of the pages since we don't have to moderate the new ones so we'll probably work on it soon. --[[User:Petertwnsnd\|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd\|Message a Mod]]) 01:11, 21 June 2015 (EDT)		<!-- /URWIKI_DISCUSSION_CONSOLIDATION_NOTICE -->
	::I don't like the idea of making an entire page a template. Templates are for little sections that we often reuse, but an entire page should never be a template. What if we want to add some new sections to some character pages? What if we need different CSS? Template fields also really limit the options you have for both content and mark-~~up. Not to mention that it would be very confusing for new editors to edit, since it doesn't work the way normal MediaWiki mark~~-up does. I think we should style both the old and new character pages to this sample, sure, I'm all for consistency, I think it's a very good idea. But not making it a template. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:45, 21 June 2015 (EDT)

	~~== Order ==~~
	~~Personally I think History should be between Relationships and Notable Attributes. I think it fits more up top.~~ --~~[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:46, 21 June 2015 (EDT)~~

Flow talk page manager: Wikitext talk to Flow conversion

2015-06-25T12:37:01Z

Wikitext talk to Flow conversion

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, 25 June 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Archive for converted wikitext talk page\|from=Talk:Character Page Sample\|date=2015-06-25}}

	== Template ==		== Template ==

Flow talk page manager: Flow talk page manager moved page Talk:Character Page Sample to Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect: Conversion of wikitext talk to Flow from Talk:Character Page Sample

2015-06-25T12:37:01Z

Flow talk page manager moved page Talk:Character Page Sample to Talk:Character Page Sample/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect: Conversion of wikitext talk to Flow from Talk:Character Page Sample

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, 25 June 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[]		== Template ==

			This page could probably be made a template for more people to be able to see and use it. [[User:Pcplague\|Pcplague]] ([[User talk:Pcplague\|talk]]) 01:02, 21 June 2015 (EDT)
			: At this point it's not finalized. The mods were talking about making an update unified style for all the Character pages since some are disjointed and most have useless sections. Theoretically we could make it a template, however it'd tka e along time and have to be pretty intricate. Because we didn't have a campaign this week we have more time to re-do and fine tune a lot of the pages since we don't have to moderate the new ones so we'll probably work on it soon. --[[User:Petertwnsnd\|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd\|Message a Mod]]) 01:11, 21 June 2015 (EDT)
			::I don't like the idea of making an entire page a template. Templates are for little sections that we often reuse, but an entire page should never be a template. What if we want to add some new sections to some character pages? What if we need different CSS? Template fields also really limit the options you have for both content and mark-up. Not to mention that it would be very confusing for new editors to edit, since it doesn't work the way normal MediaWiki mark-up does. I think we should style both the old and new character pages to this sample, sure, I'm all for consistency, I think it's a very good idea. But not making it a template. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:45, 21 June 2015 (EDT)

			== Order ==
			Personally I think History should be between Relationships and Notable Attributes. I think it fits more up top. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:46, 21 June 2015 (EDT)

Flow talk page manager: /* Taken over by Flow */

2015-06-25T12:37:01Z

Taken over by Flow

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, 25 June 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Template ==~~		[]

	~~This page could probably be made a template for more people to be able to see and use it.~~ [~~[User:Pcplague\|Pcplague]] ([[User talk:Pcplague\|talk]]) 01:02, 21 June 2015 (EDT)~~
	: At this point it's not finalized. The mods were talking about making an update unified style for all the Character pages since some are disjointed and most have useless sections. Theoretically we could make it a template, however it'd tka e along time and have to be pretty intricate. Because we didn't have a campaign this week we have more time to re-do and fine tune a lot of the pages since we don't have to moderate the new ones so we'll probably work on it soon. --[[User:Petertwnsnd\|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd\|Message a Mod]]) 01:11, 21 June 2015 (EDT)
	::I don't like the idea of making an entire page a template. Templates are for little sections that we often reuse, but an entire page should never be a template. What if we want to add some new sections to some character pages? What if we need different CSS? Template fields also really limit the options you have for both content and mark-up. Not to mention that it would be very confusing for new editors to edit, since it doesn't work the way normal MediaWiki mark-up does. I think we should style both the old and new character pages to this sample, sure, I'm all for consistency, I think it's a very good idea. But not making it a template. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:45, 21 June 2015 (EDT)

	~~== Order ==~~
	~~Personally I think History should be between Relationships and Notable Attributes. I think it fits more up top. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]~~]~~) 07:46, 21 June 2015 (EDT)~~

imported>Razorhead: Feedback about sample

2015-06-21T11:46:58Z

Feedback about sample

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:46, 21 June 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:
	: At this point it's not finalized. The mods were talking about making an update unified style for all the Character pages since some are disjointed and most have useless sections. Theoretically we could make it a template, however it'd tka e along time and have to be pretty intricate. Because we didn't have a campaign this week we have more time to re-do and fine tune a lot of the pages since we don't have to moderate the new ones so we'll probably work on it soon. --[[User:Petertwnsnd\|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd\|Message a Mod]]) 01:11, 21 June 2015 (EDT)		: At this point it's not finalized. The mods were talking about making an update unified style for all the Character pages since some are disjointed and most have useless sections. Theoretically we could make it a template, however it'd tka e along time and have to be pretty intricate. Because we didn't have a campaign this week we have more time to re-do and fine tune a lot of the pages since we don't have to moderate the new ones so we'll probably work on it soon. --[[User:Petertwnsnd\|Petertwnsnd]] ([[User talk:Petertwnsnd\|Message a Mod]]) 01:11, 21 June 2015 (EDT)
	::I don't like the idea of making an entire page a template. Templates are for little sections that we often reuse, but an entire page should never be a template. What if we want to add some new sections to some character pages? What if we need different CSS? Template fields also really limit the options you have for both content and mark-up. Not to mention that it would be very confusing for new editors to edit, since it doesn't work the way normal MediaWiki mark-up does. I think we should style both the old and new character pages to this sample, sure, I'm all for consistency, I think it's a very good idea. But not making it a template. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:45, 21 June 2015 (EDT)		::I don't like the idea of making an entire page a template. Templates are for little sections that we often reuse, but an entire page should never be a template. What if we want to add some new sections to some character pages? What if we need different CSS? Template fields also really limit the options you have for both content and mark-up. Not to mention that it would be very confusing for new editors to edit, since it doesn't work the way normal MediaWiki mark-up does. I think we should style both the old and new character pages to this sample, sure, I'm all for consistency, I think it's a very good idea. But not making it a template. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:45, 21 June 2015 (EDT)

			== Order ==
			Personally I think History should be between Relationships and Notable Attributes. I think it fits more up top. --[[User:Razorhead\|Razorhead]] ([[User talk:Razorhead\|Leave me a note]]) 07:46, 21 June 2015 (EDT)